Here's what I thought you'd like to hear about today:
- Is Iran Helping the Insurgency in Iraq?
- How long will we be in Iraq?
- Press Gone Wild
Listen
Subscribe
Add Wizbang Podcast to iTunes
Is Iran Helping the Insurgency in Iraq?
In a recent blog post, the sometimes hysterical Andrew Sullivan thought that he'd caught General Pace, and by extension Donald Rumsfeld, in a lie. This is one of Sullivan's hobbies, and he cited a press conference at the Pentagon to prove his point. I'll read Andrew's blog post, with the actual speakers talking, followed by a clip of the rest of the answer at the 3/14 Pentagon briefing. Thanks to the Pentagon Channel Podcast for the audio of the press conference, and Whitehouse.gov for the President's remarks. Sullivan should be ashamed of himself. From the Daily Dish:
Bush vs Pace15 Mar 2006 12:11 pm
Just when you think this administration may have learned something about exaggerating claims or saying things that are not rock-solid in the war on terror, you get the following contrast. On Monday, the president said the following:
"Some of the most powerful IEDs we are seeing in Iraq today includes components that came from Iran.
Our director of national intelligence, John Negroponte, told the Congress, Tehran has been responsible for at least some of the increasing lethality of anti-coalition attacks by providing Shia militia with the capability to build improvised explosive devices in Iraq.
Coalition forces have seized IEDs and components that were clearly produced in Iran. Such actions, along with Iran's support for terrorism and its pursuit of nuclear weapons, are increasingly isolating Iran."
Yesterday's Pentagon press conference elicited the following exchange, acording to Reuters:
"President George W. Bush said on Monday components from Iran were being used in powerful roadside bombs used in Iraq, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week that Iranian Revolutionary Guard personnel had been inside Iraq.
Asked whether the United States has proof that Iran's government was behind these developments, Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Pentagon briefing, 'I do not, sir.'"
I cannot imagine it's a good idea for the president to offer what is billed as an honest assesssment of what's going on in Iraq, while his chief military commander sees no proof for the accusation. We've just learned not to trust what this president says about Iran. It keeps getting better, doesn't it?
Now listen to the rest of the answer to the question
Play second part of clip.
Sullivan failed to acknowledge that Pace was answering the very narrow questions of "proof of Iranian government involvement". But there is clearly more to the story than that disingenous "gotcha" moment that Sullivan indicated. Shame on him.
How Long will we be in Iraq?
In a recent Pentagon press conference, Rumsfeld was asked by "Brett" how long the insurgency would last. He had a nice answer.
Play clip.
We don't want any 40-year-olds who can't ride a bike.
Press Gone Wild
I love the political theater of the White House Press Corps. They are so much more dramatic than the Pentagon corps. Or perhaps McClellan's sticking to the party line so closely sets them off. March 16 had two outstanding examples of what I call "Press Gone Wild". The first was David "calling in drunk" Gregory, and the second was Helen "Crazy Aunt in the Attic" Thomas. Thanks to Newsbusters, The Media Blog on NRO, and Kim Priestap at Wizbang for pointing out the examples. Thanks to C-SPAN for the video.
Play clips.
I wonder if these guys get a kick out of looking like fools every day in front of a national TV audience.
Comments (4)
Did you notice, by the way,... (Below threshold)1. Posted by RT | March 18, 2006 6:49 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did you notice, by the way, that the initial premise - that Iran was supplying the Iraqi Shi'ites with IED components - was a bit flaky?
Our troops, by and large, aren't under attack from Shi'ites; it's the freakin' Sunni insurgency that's the problem.
If the Shi'ites are against us, where they get their IEDs from will be irrelevant, because we can't stay in Iraq without Shi'ite support. Period.
So the whole thing is just bullshit.
1. Posted by RT | March 18, 2006 6:49 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 18, 2006 06:49
2. Posted by Charlie Quidnunc | March 18, 2006 9:01 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Iran cares more about damaging the U.S. than they do about a relatively trivial Sunni vs. Shia controversy. Its the Muslim world against the West, as far as the leaders of Iran are concerned.
There are dozens of groups that have dozens of reasons to attack our soldiers.
And our intent is not to stay anyway. Listen to Rumsfeld's answer. We are not staying until Iraq is as calm as Muncie, Indiana. We are staying until the Iraq security forces are strong enough to defeat the insurgency on their own.
2. Posted by Charlie Quidnunc | March 18, 2006 9:01 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 18, 2006 09:01
3. Posted by VT | March 18, 2006 11:04 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Charlie, are you a leg of Rumsfeld's Information Operations Roadmap? You sure sound like you are a governmental, propaganda machine. (Readers please do a search on Information Operations Roadmap or Information Operations) .
You think it is a "narrow question" to ask for proof that Iran is supplying Iraq with IED's? Do you believe that American's do not deserve proof before we decide that another nation is a danger to us? We have another preemptive war at hand and solid proof this time around is asking little.
American citizens and congress were led to war based on lies by Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney and Rice. View http://intelligence.senate.gov/Iraq to see the report by the US Senate Committee on Intelligence concerning this administration's lies.
Iran and Iraq (amongst other nations) were (and are) a target of the neo-conservative "world dominance" plan well before September 11, 2001. To confirm this read one of the many articles from the Project for a New American Century (http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm). Members of the Project for a New American Century include Rumsfeld and Cheney.
I find it very difficult to trust an administration that has outright lied to the citizens repeatedly. Journalists and the nation must be wary of this administration. They have lost the faith of the American people.
I hope the media continues to ask such "narrow questions" given what is at stake here.
3. Posted by VT | March 18, 2006 11:04 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 18, 2006 11:04
4. Posted by Charlie Quidnunc | March 19, 2006 4:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm no leg. I do think that the question by that Reuters reporter Charlie, who was being honored by Rumsfeld with a small ceremony at the end of the press conference to celebrate his retirement, was intended to place the administration in a bad light. We have no proof of government of Iran's involvement. But we have overwhelming evidence that IED's and other war materal are coming from Iran. Do you think the Mullahs just let it happen?
4. Posted by Charlie Quidnunc | March 19, 2006 4:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 16:42